Mind the Gap: The Bumpy Transition From Medical School to Residency.
نویسندگان
چکیده
I n 2008, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education began development of the Next Accreditation System, an assessment strategy based on residents’ achievement of specific milestones within defined competencies as they progress through training. Medical specialties were tasked with creating milestones specific to their training programs. Although similar competency frameworks were used across specialties, these milestones were largely developed in isolation. Not surprisingly, the resulting milestones were ‘‘richly diverse.’’ In several specialties, Level 1 is considered the novice level, and is assumed to have been reached in medical school. In this issue of the Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 2 articles report on the use of milestones to assess learners at the transition from undergraduate medical education (UME) to graduate medical education (GME). Clay et al described the assessment of fourth-year medical students with Transitional Year Milestones during a 4-week mandatory capstone course at the conclusion of their undergraduate training, while Weizberg and colleagues measured whether emergency medicine residents had achieved Level 1 Emergency Medicine Milestones at the end of their first month of residency. Although these were neither the same subjects, nor the same set of milestones, one would expect comparable performance on the overall construct of milestone evaluation, given the difference of only 1 month of residency. However, the results of these 2 studies suggest very different levels of performance. For students in the study by Clay et al, with a range of possible milestone levels from 1 to 5, the mean milestone levels on self-, peer, and faculty evaluations ranged between 2.2 and 3.6; in fact, no mention was made of anyone failing to achieve at least Level 2. In contrast, only 20% to 73% of the cohort of residents studied by Weizberg et al achieved Level 1 milestones on faculty evaluations, and on 2 competencies, a majority of interns rated themselves as not achieving Level 1. Considering the difficulties with self-assessment, it is remarkable that interns admitted they did not achieve entry-level milestones. Depending on the subcompetency, 34% to 92% of interns reported achieving Level 1 on self-evaluations. Can we explain how senior medical school students achieved levels 2 to 3 milestones in one group, while a second group of interns in their first month of residency are, for the most part, not achieving Level 1?
منابع مشابه
Evaluation of Quality Gap of Educational Services from the Residency Students Viewpoint of Zanjan University of Medical Sciences in 2017-2018
Background & Objective: Evaluation of satisfaction of students with educational services of universities can show the gap between their expectations and the current state. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the quality gap of educational services from the viewpoint of residency students of Zanjan University of Medical Sciences in 2017-2018. Materials and Methods: This analytical and cros...
متن کاملNu Nurse residency program: a promising, yet neglected strategy for the education of senior nursing students
Quality and safety of patient care remarkably depend on the competency of healthcare providers. As predominant caregivers, nurses crucially influence the quality of patient care (1). On the other hand, as major educational organizations, nursing schools must offer competent expertise to the students in order to warrant high-quality patient care. In this regard, finding efficient methods to grad...
متن کاملOn Health Policy and Management (HPAM): Mind the Theory-Policy-Practice Gap
We argue that the field of Health Policy and Management (HPAM) ought to confront the gap between theory, policy, and practice. Although there are perennial efforts to reform healthcare systems, the conceptual barriers are considerable and reflect the theory-policy-practice gap. We highlight four dimensions of the gap: 1) the dominance of microeconomic thinking in health policy analysis and desi...
متن کاملHealth Policy and Management: In Praise of Political Science; Comment on “On Health Policy and Management (HPAM): Mind the Theory-Policy Practice Gap”
Health systems have entered a third era embracing whole systems thinking and posing complex policy and management challenges. Understanding how such systems work and agreeing what needs to be put in place to enable them to undergo effective and sustainable change are more pressing issues than ever for policy-makers. The theory-policy-practice-gap and its four dimensions, as articulated by Chini...
متن کاملAn American Plague: Pro-Market Believers in Health Policy; Comment on “On Health Policy and Management (HPAM): Mind the Theory-Policypractice Gap”
Although American health policy debates address similar problems to other developed nations, it has factual and ideological specificities. I agree with Chinitz and Rodwin on the dominance of micro-economics thinking. However, I am not certain that learning from management theory or modifying medical education will be powerful enough to change the system. The vested interests of the stakeholders...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of graduate medical education
دوره 7 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015